Computing Technology for Math Excellence Logo 

 

 

Home
Up
Search CT4ME
Math Initiatives
Math Methodology
Math Projects
Math Resources
Math Software
Standards
Professional Dev.
Assisting Readers
Associations
News
Journals
Papers
Contact
About This Site
Site Map

 

Are you confused by terms that educators use? The Lexicon of Learning might be just what you need.

 

Black line

 

Technology Integration

 

Part 1: Essential Questions (Page 2 of 2)

Animated boy working at a computer

Technology Integration is a four part series on essential questions, technology integration resources, web page design, and multimedia in projects.  Sections contain relevant opening essays and resources.

  • Part 1: Essential Questions

    Essential Questions (Page 1):

    • How is technology affecting the learning process?

    • What is technological literacy?

    • What do we mean by technology integration?

    • How should technology be used? 

    • What principles should guide your approach for integrating technology into instruction?

    • When can you expect technology to be effective? 

    • What are courseware and digital content types for mathematics?

    • What do you do, if you are not convinced you can integrate technology into your instruction?  

    Arrow: You are hereEssential Questions (Page 2): 

  • Part 2: Technology Integration Resources

    • Page 1: General Resources

    • Page 2: Building Internet, Search and Citation Skills, including some Web 2.0 resources that make conducting research easier.

    • Page 3: Online Student and Computer Safety

    • Page 4: Grants, Other Funding, Grant Writing, and Free Resources

  • Part 3: Web Page Design
     

  • Part 4: Multimedia in Projects
     

    • Page 1: About Multimedia and Project Development

    • Page 2: Tools for Viewing and Creating Media

    • Page 3: Copyright, Fair Use, Plagiarism

 

 

Small question mark How does technology change thinking?

Technology use changes thinkingThe dynamics of the learning process are influenced in turn by the ways people think: rational versus creative; deductive versus inductive; logic versus perception; analysis versus synthesis.  Our thinking is both individual and social.  It is also affected by our emotional state, attitudes, and experiences.  With the rise of artificial intelligence, some of that thinking is offloaded to machines. 

According to Rupert Wegerif (2002),  "[T]he kinds of thinking that people value most depend on the cultural and historical context and particularly upon the kind of technology that people have at their disposal to help them think” (p. 11).  “Technology, in various forms from language to the internet, carries the external form of thinking. Technology therefore has a role to play through supporting improved social thinking (e.g. providing systems to mediate decision making and collective reasoning) and also through providing tools to help individuals externalize their thinking and so to shape their own social worlds” (p. 15).

Robert Kuhn (2000), an expert in brain research, indicates that few people really understand the complex nature of how technology is transforming thinking.  “The change in mental process is nothing less than a shift in worldview. Technology is radically transforming our thinking in at least three new ways:

(1) information is freely available, and therefore interdisciplinary ideas and cross-cultural communication are widely accessible;

(2) time is compressed, and therefore reflection is condensed and decision-making is compacted;

(3) individuals are empowered, and therefore private choice and reach are strengthened and one person can have the presence of an institution.

So what kind of new thinking is technology engendering? Notice what happens. With an increasing number of diverse ideas circulating freely and widely, and with people more empowered but with less time to assess value, and with vast communications amplifying opinions, this new thinking is at once creative and innovative, volatile and turbulent.” (sec: Concluding Remarks).

The new tools for communication that have become part of the 21st century no doubt contribute to thinking and that creativity, innovation, volatility, and turbulence that Kuhn indicates.  Hence, the glossary that follows takes a further look at some of those.

 

Back to top   

 

 

Glossary of Web 2.0 Terms, Tools and Concerns: What are all these?

Question markInitially the Internet was characterized as a place to go to find information.  It was linked with the term "Web 1.0," a read-only one-way medium.  However,  Web 2.0 is an evolution to a read/write medium and is the new expectation enabling anyone to participate, collaborate, and share information online using many of the tools listed below.  View Jeff Utecht's Web 2.0 video on YouTube to learn more about Web 2.0 and how it differs from Web 1.0.  If you need some “Explanations in Plain English“ on several on the new Web 2.0 tools (e.g., blogs, wikis, webcasts, podcasts, social networks, and social bookmarks), view Lee LeFever’s short video clips on those topics at You Tube.  Then to get started with Web 2.0, visit Classroom 2.0, the social network for educators using collaborative technologies.

 

A Taste of Web 2.0--and mostly free, too!

Here's a primer for the unknowing and those who want to take their technology use to the next level.  Read Dr. Patricia Deubel's A Taste of Web 2.0 in T.H.E. Journal Collaboration 2.0 (2008, March 19).

Issues for Web 2.0, Social Software, and Digital Tools

Advancements in technology, principally Web 2.0, social software, and digital tools, have challenged what it means to be educated and how we proceed to educate our youth in a culture where innovation and creativity, lifelong learning, personalization (my own learning space), and knowledge from and with the collective vie for a rightful place. Read Dr. Patricia Deubel, P. (2008, Apr. 16). Crossroads in Education: Issues for Web 2.0, Social Software, and Digital Tools in T.H.E. Journal Collaboration 2.0 (2008, April 16).

 

Aggregator: "A service that gathers information published by different sources and organizes it together under a common search interface. The aggregator may also license access to a collection of journals from many different publishers" (The British Library, glossary).  An aggregator is a time saver.  Think of it as your personal collection agency. Rather than going out to search multiple sites individually, the aggregator will do it for you and deposit current information from favorite blogs and news sites directly in a central location.

Aggregators work together with RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feeds.  Look for an RSS icon on your favorite sites and subscribe to them.  Aggregator tools include:

The following are tutorials and information about setting up your aggregator and working with RSS:

  • Classroom 2.0 has Lee LeFever's RSS in Plain English (2007, April) with a very concise explanation of RSS.
  • In RSS: A quick start guide for educators, Will Richardson (2005) describes the process for setting up your own RSS (Really Simple Syndication) Feed Reader, how to find and add feeds, using RSS feeds in the classroom, and he provides resources.
  • RSS Tutorial for content publishers and webmasters also includes a brief technical overview, how people use feeds, choosing content for feeds, and publishing your feed.
  • Watch the short informational video clip on setting up an RSS feed, hosted by Edutopia.org.
  • RSS Compendium: http://allrss.com/rssfeeds.html provides links to major collections of feeds in several categories. 

Blog: short for Web log, "a website for which an individual or a group frequently generates text, photographs, video, or audio files, and/or links, typically (but not always) on a daily basis" (Wikipedia). Postings are chronological, and unlike wikis, cannot be edited by others (Fountain, n.d.)

Blogs in the classroom:

Dan McDowell (2004) proposes blogging techniques for the K12 classroom and provides links to examples of each.  Educators can use blogs as administrative tools for one-way delivery of information to students and parents.  Blogs can be used as discussion tools.  A teacher might post a discussion question or topic on a single blog, and students post their responses.  Or, teachers can allow students to not only respond, but to post their own comments.  Blogs can also be used as publication tools.  Students each have their own blog on which they post assignments, projects, digital portfolios, reflections, and so on. 

Tip:  If students each have their own blog, consider setting up a blog aggregator, so that you as the teacher can read the blogs and comment to the group without having to go to each blog separately.

Blogs can serve a personal agenda or be journalistic in nature. Educators might need to justify that using a blog will contribute to helping students reach instructional objectives and master standards, so that they perform well on state-mandated tests. But, consider that blogs offer the collaboration so important in a learner-centered instructional environment. 

If you use a blog, it should be an integral part of your instruction, so that students will not view it as just another thing to do.  According to Ruth Reynard (2007), when used throughout a course, the statements that students make while blogging can be categorized to demonstrate their learning.  Each student develops his/her own voice in the process.  Reynard indicates, "Student response statements really cover a wide variety of "types" that reflect the instructional goals of the courses. That is, when developing individual voice throughout a learning process, each stage of that process is often reflected in the students' comments," which she categorizes into reflective, commentary, new idea, or application statements (online p. 1, Statement categories).

Advance preparation is needed, including preparing students for how to write to a blog so that what they say is LARK, the acronym for Legal, Appropriate, Responsible, and Kind.  Julie Sturgeon (2008) provides some pitfall to avoid when using blogs in the classroom: 

  1. Educators should not just jump in to blogging.  Before students blog alone, Anne Davis (Sturgeon, 2008) says that teachers should "spend time letting students see samples, understand guidelines, and anticipate blogging and what it can mean to their learning" (p. 26).  Consider using Davis's 2006 Webquest, Blogging: It's Elementary!, to introduce your elementary students to blogging.
  2. Don't confuse blogging with social networking.  An educational blog is about collaboration and expressing ideas related to academic content.
  3. Don't leap to freebies.  Some free blog spaces post advertisements out of the educator's control.  The blog might not be a private space.  Students might be able to access the entire blogging world and vice-versa.
  4. Don't force a sequential style.  Blog posts appear in reverse chronological order and valuable content might be overlooked as time passes.  With advance preparation, teachers can add structure to a blog by designating topics for discussion.
  5. Don't leave the blogging to the students.  Teachers need to join in the discussion. (pp. 26-30).

 

Moderating and Ethics for the Classroom Instructional Blog

For how to's on moderating and using a classroom instructional blog, read Dr. Patricia Deubel's Moderating and Ethics for the Classroom Instructional Blog in K-12 Tech Trends (2007, February 21).

Blogging tools:

The number of blogging tools for classroom use is increasing.  See examples and get the how to's using the following resources:

Blog Safety and Ethics:

Online safety and ethics must be considered; students should sign a code of conduct.  In general, any blogging code of ethics should strike a balance between free expression with factual truth.  Ethical considerations, which students must be taught, include the need for truth, accuracy, and accountability for what they say, and respect for others even when students might disagree. There is also need to ensure that bloggers keep private issues private to minimize potential harm to others.  Consider the following for online safety and sample contracts for bloggers:

Folksonomy: The word is derived from "folk" and "taxonomy."  As opposed to taxonomy, which is a predefined traditional classification scheme created by authors of content for their own works or by professionals for the work of others ( e.g., as for a library or Yahoo.com),  this is a new concept in which users (sometimes called amateurs) of social bookmarking systems on the Web categorize their own information for later retrieval.  Users add their own keywords or tags to content they save, creating personalized or community-based organizational systems.  In time the community develops its own structure of keyword descriptors to define its resources. 

In Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata, Adam Mathes (2004, Dec) discusses the advantages and disadvantages of folksonomies and their potential impact on information retrieval systems.  He elaborates on their nature by discussing two popular sites for sharing digital content: Del.icio.us (tool for organizing web pages) and Flickr (tool for photo management and sharing). Note: Educators should exercise caution if using Flickr, as some content might not be appropriate for K-12 learners.  There are alternatives for Web site photo management for student projects, which include log-in and password features (e.g., Gallery, which is an open source Web-based photo album organizer).

Educause Learning Initiave (2005, May). 7 things you should know about Social Bookmarking.

Wikipedia also discusses folksonomies and provides additional resources.

Modding: "a slang expression for the act of modifying a piece of hardware or software to perform a function not intended by someone with legal rights concerning that modification" (Wikipedia).

Podcast: Audio-based file, essentially like a radio program, which is available on the Web.  It can be played by any computer connected to the Internet or downloaded to play on iPods or other devices that can play MP3 audio files.  The file can be created using a computer, microphone, free software, and access to a web site for posting (The Education Podcast Network, What is a Podcast?).

Podcasts and learning:

  • Podcasting: A Teaching with Technology White Paper by Ashley Deal (2007) of Carnegie Mellon University explores the educational value of podcasting in three ways: "the creation and distribution of lecture archives for review, the delivery of supplemental educational materials and content, and assignments requiring students to produce and submit their own podcasts" (p. 1). "Does podcasting enhance education? The answer to that question depends entirely on the educational context, including goals and appropriate learning activities, and on how the tool is implemented. Podcasting does not contain any inherent value. It is only valuable inasmuch as it helps the instructor and students reach their educational goals, by facilitating thoughtful, engaging learning activities that are designed to work in support of those goals" (p. 12).

Podcasting

Read the two-part series on podcasting by Dr. Patricia Deubel in T.H.E. SmartClassroom (2007): Podcasts: Where's the learning? and Podcasts: Improving quality and accessibility.

Podcast aggregators:

Podcast directories:

Other podcast examples, how to's, copyright/legal info:

Podcast Tips:

  • When creating podcasts, consider learners who might be hearing impaired.  They would benefit from a text version of the podcast that is posted online.  If the content is part of course requirements, all learners must have access to it.
  • If you use a podcast in your instruction, Ann Marie Dlott (2007) suggests that you might use a think aloud strategy to "demonstrate the skills students would need to listen successfully to a podcast: how to rewind, replay, and pause to take notes" (p. 81). 
  • If students create their own podcast, provide a rubric so they will know how their work will be critiqued.
  • When posting your podcast, add metatags so that the podcast can be easily retrieved.  The following is a sample of metadata that you might consider for podcasts (Boettcher, 2007, p. 3 [online]):
    • Title [Your Podcast Show Name] [Episode Number] [Episode Name]
    • Artist [Author]
    • Album [Your Podcast Show Name]
    • Track [Episode Number]
    • Comments [Episode Description]
    • Genre: Podcast   

Social Network:  A "map of the relationships between individuals, indicating the ways in which they are connected through various social familiarities ranging from casual acquaintance to close familial bonds"  (Wikipedia).

Note:  In 2006, a nationally representative telephone survey was conducted for the Pew Internet & American Life Project using a sample of 935 teens, ages 12-17, including a parent or guardian.  Results indicated that 55% of the online teens have their profiles online and are using social networks to communicate with current friends and to make new friends.  The majority of those only post their first names (81%), but they have included pictures of themselves (79%) and friends (66%), information about where they live (61%) and share their school name (41%) (Lenhart & Madden, 2007, pp. ii-iii).  

Social Network Tools:  When you think about it, the telephone is a social networking tool, as is group or individual email, or a face-to-face meeting (with or without notes to document what happened or what was said).  However, below might be more in line with thoughts on newer tools.

  • Instant messaging
  • Application sharing, as in Google Apps (see Simply Google for a list of those).
  • Interactive whiteboards
  • Live webcams
  • VOIP, as with Skype for your telephone service, or online conferencing programs
  • wikis
  • discussion forums/groups
  • blogs

Safe Social Networking Sites:  Social networks are a source of concern for parents and schools because of the online safety issues for students who use them.  Sites like Flickr, MySpace, YouTube, Del.icio.us, and Facebook might be among those, as they are open to anyone to use. However, there are social networks that parents with their kids and educators can use in which they can create a private, protected environment for learning, and which have been rated as safe. Examples:

  • Classroom 2.0: http://www.classroom20.com/) is  a social networking site for educators interested in Web 2.0 and collaboration.
  • Elgg: http://elgg.org/   (named after a town in Switzerland) is free open-source social networking software for educators and their students to create a secure "personal learning landscape.  "It offers blogging, networking, community, collecting of news using feeds aggregation and file sharing features. Everything can be shared among users with access controls and everything can be cataloged by tags as well."  If you are concerned about it's use in K-12, consider that you can install it on your own servers and have complete control over it.
  • Imbee: https://www.imbee.com/ has a teacher feature to extend the classroom online with class blogs and interaction to safely guide students into social networking.  Cost is free.
  • Ning: http://www.ning.com/ Networks can be public or private.  Ad-free networks are available for K-12 classrooms.
  • Think.com: http://www.think.com/en/, sponsored by Oracle Education Foundation as a free resource to K-12 schools, provides a safe password-protected environment to connect schools, teachers, and students from around the world to collaborate on projects, share experiences, and build knowledge together.  Simple publishing tools are provided for teachers and students to create their own web pages and engage in discussion.
  • TIGed (TakingITGlobal): http://www.takingitglobal.org/tiged/ offers a collaborative environment in which students gain access to global perspectives on global issues and new options for expressing their creativity.  They can engage in project-based learning.  A database of lessons is included.  The environment is under control of the teacher, making safe social networking possible. TakingITGlobal.org membership is free, but small fees are attached for TIGed virtual classrooms, activity database, and teacher discussion boards.
  • Whyville: http://www.whyville.net/smmk/nice is for 8-15 year olds. In 2006, Whyville received iParenting's award for its safety features.

Vodcast or Vidcast: a video podcast

VoIP: (Voice over Internet Protocol) is a technology that "allows you to make telephone calls using a broadband Internet connection instead of a regular (or analog) phone line" (Federal Communications Commission). Examples:

  • Elluminate's vRoom: http://www.elluminate.com provides VoIP and is a free, Web conferencing tool for up to three people.  It enables users to integrate real-time interaction into daily activities, including small group meetings and training, one-on-one tutoring, interviewing and virtual office hours. It includes two-way audio, interactive whiteboard, direct messaging, application sharing, file transfer, live web cam, and more.
  • Skype: http://www.skype.com/  is a free downloadable program that will allow you to make free calls over the internet to anyone in the world who also has Skype.

Webcast: A program combining audio and video that is delivered live or played back on demand over the Internet.

You might begin your exploration of webcasts with the following:

Wiki: Hawaiian for quick, "a type of website that allows users to add and edit content and is especially suited for constructive collaborative authoring" (Wikipedia).  Wikis can be organized many ways (e.g., subjects, categories, hierarchies).  They often contain a search engine, unlike many blogs (Fountain, n.d.).

For more on the role of wikis in education, see:

Wiki Tools:

  • PBwiki.com: http://pbwiki.com/ 

  • Wikispaces for Educators: http://www.wikispaces.com/site/for/teachers offers K-12 educators space to create their wikis--all for free and without advertising.  You can designate your wiki as public, protected, or private.  Public wikis can be viewed and edited by anyone.  Protected wikis can be viewed by anyone, but only members can edit content.  Private wikis might be preferred by educators, as only members can view and edit pages. 

Wiki Concerns:

Will Richardson (2005) provides a cautionary statement about the use of wikis: "There are no technological safeguards against a user putting bogus information into the site or vandalizing an entry; the community of people using the wiki keeps the information accurate by policing itself" (p. 25).  On the positive side, however, best practices for using wikis in both business and educational environments include for project management, reducing email overload, and building a dynamic intranet, according to Jeff Brainard of Socialtext.net (Kane, Reingold, Brainard, 2007). 

Classroom wikis are great educational tools for student collaboration and note taking as teachers can track student postings.  However, public wikis (e.g., Wikipedia) can pose a problem when used as research tools.  Users don't necessarily know anything about the authors of the content, their credibility, and validity of the content posted.  We need to encourage students to use primary and secondary sources when conducting research, and to teach students critical evaluation skills for what they read.  As educators, we are faced with the dilemma of using public wikis as "sources consulted" but not "sources cited" (Schrock, 2007, pp. 38-39).  In fairness, however, Wikipedia is making greater effort to ensure credibility and reliability of its content (e.g., see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources).  You’ll see lists of references at the bottom of pages.  Imbedded within content,  citations are numbered and you will see the phrase “citation needed” next to unreferenced content.  For example, look for those as you read about Web 2.0 at Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0).

 

Paper on fire for hot news

HOT:  Need more inspiration to try Web 2.0 tools?

Check out the Edublog Awards (http://edublogawards.com/) from 2004-2007 in best of everything categories (e.g., individual, group, new, and teacher blogs; best educational use of audio, video, social networking service, virtual world, wiki and more).  Of course, you can then visit those sites.

Read Web 2.0 Coming of Age: An introduction to the NEW worldwide web (http://www.shambles.net/web2/comingofage/index.htm) edited by Terry Freedman (2006).  This free 93-page booklet, also available in audio format, provides more practical advice on how to get going and applications in education. 

HOT:  Need help with keeping up?

Webopedia is online dictionary and search engine for computer and Internet technology definitions. Webopedia Web 2.0 terms will help you expand your vocabulary.

The University of Manitoba's Learning Technologies Centre has created a wiki, "Net Technologies for Teaching and Learning," to help you keep up with the latest on Flickr, Blogs, Wikis, SocialBookmarking, Audio, Video, WebConferencing, and TyingItAllTogether.

Howard Rheingold (2006) has started one of the best resources on Participatory Media Literacy (PML). Hosted by Socialtext.net, "This wiki-based curriculum combines texts that address the social, political, economic, cultural aspects of participatory media with practical instructions in the use of each medium" (PML, sec: Syllabus).  Exercises combine theory and practice for bloggers, wiki workers, social bookmarkers and media-sharers, podcasters, and vloggers, and individuals who want to become any of those.

 

Sources for above definitions:

British Library: http://www.bl.uk/aboutus/stratpolprog/redeflib/glossary/index.html

Education Podcast Network: http://epnweb.org/  

Federal Communications Commission: http://www.fcc.gov/voip/

Fountain, R. (n.d.). Wiki pedagogy:  http://www.profetic.org:16080/dossiers/article.php3?id_article=969

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

 

Back to top

 

References

Boettcher, J. (2007, July 18). iPod course design. Campus Technology. Retrieved July 24, 2007 from http://campustechnology.com/articles/49148 

Deal, A. (2007, Jun). Podcating: A teaching with technology white paper. Carnegie Mellon University.  Available: http://connect.educause.edu/files/CMU_Podcasting_Jun07.pdf

Dlott, A. M. (2007). A (pod)cast of thousands. Educational Leadership, 64(7), 80-82.

Freedman, T. (Ed.) (2006). Web 2.0 Coming of age: An introduction to the NEW worldwide web. Available: http://www.shambles.net/web2/comingofage/index.htm

Kane, J., Reingold, H., & Brainard, J. (2007, September 6). Wikis and emerging Web 2.0 e-learning communities. Campus Technology Webinar Series. Available: http://campustechnology.com/mcv/resources/webinars/

Kuhn, R. (2000, July). How does technology transform thinking? [Show 111 transcript]. Closer to the Truth. Available: http://www.closertotruth.com/topics/creativitythinking/111/111transcript.html

Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007, Apr 18). Teens, privacy, and online social networks. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Privacy_SNS_Report_Final.pdf

Mathes, A. (2004, Dec). Folksonomies - Cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata.  University of Illinois-Urbana, Graduate School, LIS590CMC. Available: http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html

McDowell, D. (2004). Blogging techniques for the K12 classroom. In  B. Hoffman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Technology.   Retrieved July 24, 2007 from http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/bloggingtech/index.htm

Reynard, R. (2007, May 9). Instructional strategies for blogging. Campus Technology. Retrieved July 24, 2007 from http://campustechnology.com/articles/47775

Rheingold, H. (2006). Participatory media literacy. Available: https://www.socialtext.net/medialiteracy/index.cgi

Richardson, W. (2005, Dec/Jan). The educator's guide to the read/write web. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 24-27.

Schrock, K. (2007, Oct). Critical evaluation in the collaborative era. Technology & Learning, 28(3), 38-39.

Sturgeon, J. (2008, Feb). Five don'ts of classroom blogging. T.H.E. Journal, 35(2), 26-30.

Wegerif, R. (2002, Sept) Literature review in thinking skills, technology and learning. Bristol, UK: Futurelab Series. Available: http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications_reports_articles/
literature_reviews/Literature_Review394/

 

Back to top

 

Binoculars GifSee other Technology Integration pages:

Part 1: Technology Integration: Essential Questions: Page  1   |  2  |

Part 2: Technology Integration Resources  |  Part 3: Web Page Design  |  Part 4: Multimedia in Projects

Black line

Black line

Mail CT4ME Gif

Comments?  Are you finding resources at CT4ME of value?

Contact Dr. Patricia Deubel: deubelp@neo.rr.com

 

http://www.ct4me.net/technology_integr_2.htm

Last revised 06/13/08

To cite this page, use the following format:

Deubel, P. (fill in year from last revised). Technology integration: Essential questions [Online]. Retrieved [fill in date] from Computing Technology for Math Excellence at http://www.ct4me.net/technology_integr_2.htm